Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUstaoglu, Eda
dc.contributor.authorLopez, Gloria Ortega
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez-Alcoba, Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-15T12:26:21Z
dc.date.available2024-04-15T12:26:21Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.issn1387-585X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04116-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/2085
dc.description.abstractDevelopment of composite indicators is a challenging task given that sustainability indices are strongly dependent on how the sub-indicators are weighted. This is because relative indicator weights may signifcantly difer based on the chosen weighting methods used in the analysis. There is hardly any study that has paid attention to this issue so far. Therefore, this paper aims to fll this gap in the literature by searching the robustness of selected weighting methods, i.e. entropy-weight (EW), principal component analysis (PCA), machine learning approaches (random forest-RF), regression analysis (RA) and beneft-ofthe-doubt (BOD) when constructing a composite indicator. To research the current sustainability performance of European regions, the present study focuses on the Territorial Quality of Life Index—initially proposed by the ESPON Programme—that are aligned with the specifc targets of the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda. The methods to construct composite indicators include stages of data preparation (including the estimation of missing values with random forest method), normalization, statistical transformation of raw data, reduction of indicators in order to ease public communication (using the PCA method) and data interpretation, weighting of the sub-indicators using EW, PCA, RF, RA and BOD methods and their linear weighted aggregation, and checking for robustness and sensitivity. The results suggest that there are signifcant diferences in the rank and spatial distribution of composite indicators based on the use of diferent weighting methods considered in the analysis. The results from sensitivity analysis support the robustness of entropy-weight method among others. The methodology used in the current analysis can be adapted to other study areas and regions internationally. The fndings showed that Eastern European countries and some Mediterranean countries have relatively lower index values compared to other European regions; therefore, policy and planning actions are needed covering these regions specifcally.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGERen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s10668-023-04116-wen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSustainable urbanizationen_US
dc.subjectTerritorial quality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectComposite indicatorsen_US
dc.subjectWeighting proceduresen_US
dc.subjectEuropeen_US
dc.titleBuilding composite indicators for the territorial quality of life assessment in European regions: combining data reduction and alternative weighting techniquesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAGÜ, Yönetim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ekonomi Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-6874-5162en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorUstaoglu, Eda
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage39en_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironment, Development and Sustainabilityen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster