Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDinçer, Ali Ersin
dc.contributor.authorDincer, N. Nergiz
dc.contributor.authorTekin-Koru, Ayça
dc.contributor.authorYaşar, Burze
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Zafer
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T11:52:28Z
dc.date.available2024-08-20T11:52:28Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.issn22124209
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104647
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/2338
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the effects of two major earthquakes of magnitude 7.7 and 7.6 that struck Kahramanmaraş on February 6th, 2023, followed by a magnitude 6.4 quake in Hatay on February 20th, which caused major damage in 11 Turkish provinces. The study focuses on Adıyaman and Malatya and uses an interdisciplinary approach to analyze the economic and environmental impacts. Primary data sources, including field visits and interviews, reveal clear labor-related challenges in both provinces, characterized by a government-induced labor shortage. In both provinces, physical capital has been severely damaged, particularly affecting small businesses, historic bazaars, and old industrial areas. The impact on businesses varies by size and location, with Adıyaman suffering more severe setbacks than other cities. The shortage of skilled labor related to the earthquake damage affects the quality of production, which can have a serious economic impact. Transportation disruptions continue to hamper supply chains and affect companies' ability to meet their export commitments. The environmental consequences, particularly the large amount of debris, pose a major challenge. The lack of a comprehensive disaster waste plan at the central government level leads to inadequate waste management. The study recommends sorting the debris at temporary sites to obtain reusable items while paying attention to the sustainability and transparency of debris management processes. In summary, this comparative case study highlights the need for tailored approaches to address the different impacts in the 11 provinces. A one-size-fits-all solution is insufficient and an individual needs assessment is needed for each province in order to implement targeted economic and environmental recovery measures.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIERen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104647en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectKahramanmaraş (2023) earthquakesen_US
dc.subjectAdıyamanen_US
dc.subjectMalatyaen_US
dc.subjectEconomic and environmental impacten_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental pollutionen_US
dc.subjectWaste recyclingen_US
dc.subjectWaste managementen_US
dc.subjectSmall enterpriseen_US
dc.titleThe impact of Kahramanmaraş (2023) earthquakes: A comparative case study for Adıyaman and Malatyaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-4662-894Xen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDinçer, Ali Ersin
dc.identifier.volume110en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage19en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reductionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster