dc.contributor.author | Noorfatima N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Yunjeong | |
dc.contributor.author | Onen, Ahmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, Jaesung | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-16T06:40:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-16T06:40:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2352-4847 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.405 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/2123 | |
dc.description.abstract | In pay-as-bid peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading, various types of prosumers and consumers can
participate, regardless of their offers. Thus, various types of participants impact the network differently.
However, very few pay-as-bid P2P energy trading studies have specifically discussed appropriate
compensation for network usage, although the market is implemented in existing utility-owned grids.
Therefore, to improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading, it is important to determine
the appropriate compensation to utilities for network usage. This study aims to obtain an appropriate
network cost allocation method for pay-as-bid P2P energy trading. Hence, the authors present a
review of pay-as-bid P2P market mechanisms and various network cost allocation (NCA) methods.
Additionally, a comprehensive evaluation framework is proposed to determine the most appropriate
NCA method for the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. A comparison was made between various
NCA methods to investigate the outcomes of the implementation of different NCA methods to various
market conditions. The study constructs a case study based on the operator-oriented P2P model to
represent the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. The simulation of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading
with large participant number is applied in the IEEE 69-bus distribution system. The study concluded
that applying the appropriate NCA method would improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy
trading operation. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20191210301820). This work was also supported by ‘‘Human Resources Program in Energy Technology’’ of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea (No. 20194030202370). | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.405 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Peer-to-peer energy trading | en_US |
dc.subject | Pay-as-bid | en_US |
dc.subject | Network cost allocation | en_US |
dc.subject | Network usage cost | en_US |
dc.subject | Evaluation framework | en_US |
dc.title | Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | AGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Elektrik - Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümü | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | 0000-0001-7086-5112 | en_US |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Onen, Ahmet | |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 14442 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 14463 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Energy Reports | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |