Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorNoorfatima N.
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Yunjeong
dc.contributor.authorOnen, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorJung, Jaesung
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-16T06:40:15Z
dc.date.available2024-05-16T06:40:15Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn2352-4847
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.405
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/2123
dc.description.abstractIn pay-as-bid peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading, various types of prosumers and consumers can participate, regardless of their offers. Thus, various types of participants impact the network differently. However, very few pay-as-bid P2P energy trading studies have specifically discussed appropriate compensation for network usage, although the market is implemented in existing utility-owned grids. Therefore, to improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading, it is important to determine the appropriate compensation to utilities for network usage. This study aims to obtain an appropriate network cost allocation method for pay-as-bid P2P energy trading. Hence, the authors present a review of pay-as-bid P2P market mechanisms and various network cost allocation (NCA) methods. Additionally, a comprehensive evaluation framework is proposed to determine the most appropriate NCA method for the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. A comparison was made between various NCA methods to investigate the outcomes of the implementation of different NCA methods to various market conditions. The study constructs a case study based on the operator-oriented P2P model to represent the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. The simulation of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading with large participant number is applied in the IEEE 69-bus distribution system. The study concluded that applying the appropriate NCA method would improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading operation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20191210301820). This work was also supported by ‘‘Human Resources Program in Energy Technology’’ of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea (No. 20194030202370).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIERen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.405en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPeer-to-peer energy tradingen_US
dc.subjectPay-as-biden_US
dc.subjectNetwork cost allocationen_US
dc.subjectNetwork usage costen_US
dc.subjectEvaluation frameworken_US
dc.titleNetwork cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparisonen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Elektrik - Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-7086-5112en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorOnen, Ahmet
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage14442en_US
dc.identifier.endpage14463en_US
dc.relation.journalEnergy Reportsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster